home - login - register

Conference Proceedings Detail Page

Comparing Mechanistic Reasoning in Open and Guided Inquiry Physics Activities
written by Rosemary Wulf, Kathleen A. Hinko, and Noah D. Finkelstein
Inquiry activities can provide students with the chance to experiment and to externalize their reasoning. To examine the impacts of level of guidance in inquiry-based activities on students' mechanistic reasoning, we analyze middle school students' scientific notebooks from an afterschool program by applying a coding scheme that is modified from Russ (Russ, R. et al.. (2008). Sci. Ed., 92: 499–525.). We compare students' mechanistic reasoning in two inquiry physics curricula, one that is guided and another that is more open-ended inquiry. We find that students exhibit more types and more overall mechanistic reasoning in the open curriculum. We also code the curricula and find that students have more opportunities to practice mechanistic reasoning in the open-ended curriculum. We examine why students take the opportunities provided to them in both curricula and the implications for both informal and formal curriculum design.
Physics Education Research Conference 2013
Part of the PER Conference series
Portland, OR: July 17-18, 2013
Pages 369-372
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Education - Applied Research
- Active Learning
= Inquiry Learning
- Curriculum Development
= Course
- Informal Education
Education - Basic Research
- Assessment
= Methods
- Learning Theory
- Problem Solving
= Processes
- Middle School
- Reference Material
= Research study
PER-Central Type Intended Users Ratings
- PER Literature
- Researchers
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Format:
application/pdf
Mirror:
https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2013…
Access Rights:
Free access
License:
This material is released under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the published article's author(s), title, proceedings citation, and DOI.
Rights Holder:
American Association of Physics Teachers
DOI:
10.1119/perc.2013.pr.080
NSF Number:
1125844
PACSs:
01.40.Fk
01.40.-d
Keywords:
PERC 2013, curriculum, informal science education
Record Cloner:
Metadata instance created January 31, 2014 by Lyle Barbato
Record Updated:
January 31, 2014 by Lyle Barbato
Last Update
when Cataloged:
December 16, 2013
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
R. Wulf, K. Hinko, and N. Finkelstein, , presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2013, Portland, OR, 2013, WWW Document, (https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=13155&DocID=3702).
AJP/PRST-PER
R. Wulf, K. Hinko, and N. Finkelstein, Comparing Mechanistic Reasoning in Open and Guided Inquiry Physics Activities, presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2013, Portland, OR, 2013, <https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=13155&DocID=3702>.
APA Format
Wulf, R., Hinko, K., & Finkelstein, N. (2013, July 17-18). Comparing Mechanistic Reasoning in Open and Guided Inquiry Physics Activities. Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2013, Portland, OR. Retrieved October 10, 2024, from https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=13155&DocID=3702
Chicago Format
Wulf, R, K. Hinko, and N. Finkelstein. "Comparing Mechanistic Reasoning in Open and Guided Inquiry Physics Activities." Paper presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2013, Portland, OR, July 17-18, 2013. https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=13155&DocID=3702 (accessed 10 October 2024).
MLA Format
Wulf, Rosemary, Kathleen Hinko, and Noah Finkelstein. "Comparing Mechanistic Reasoning in Open and Guided Inquiry Physics Activities." Physics Education Research Conference 2013. Portland, OR: 2013. 369-372 of PER Conference. 10 Oct. 2024 <https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=13155&DocID=3702>.
BibTeX Export Format
@inproceedings{ Author = "Rosemary Wulf and Kathleen Hinko and Noah Finkelstein", Title = {Comparing Mechanistic Reasoning in Open and Guided Inquiry Physics Activities}, BookTitle = {Physics Education Research Conference 2013}, Pages = {369-372}, Address = {Portland, OR}, Series = {PER Conference}, Month = {July 17-18}, Year = {2013} }
Refer Export Format

%A Rosemary Wulf %A Kathleen Hinko %A Noah Finkelstein %T Comparing Mechanistic Reasoning in Open and Guided Inquiry Physics Activities %S PER Conference %D July 17-18 2013 %P 369-372 %C Portland, OR %U https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=13155&DocID=3702 %O Physics Education Research Conference 2013 %O July 17-18 %O application/pdf

EndNote Export Format

%0 Conference Proceedings %A Wulf, Rosemary %A Hinko, Kathleen %A Finkelstein, Noah %D July 17-18 2013 %T Comparing Mechanistic Reasoning in Open and Guided Inquiry Physics Activities %B Physics Education Research Conference 2013 %C Portland, OR %P 369-372 %S PER Conference %8 July 17-18 %U https://www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=13155&DocID=3702


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The AJP/PRST-PER presented is based on the AIP Style with the addition of journal article titles and conference proceeding article titles.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Comparing Mechanistic Reasoning in Open and Guided Inquiry Physics Activities:


Know of another related resource? Login to relate this resource to it.
Save to my folders

Contribute

Related Materials

Similar Materials