home - login - register

Report Detail Page

Item Picture
written by Susan Ramlo
The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation (FMCE) is a multiple-choice test that has been used to evaluate physics instruction. However, the validity and reliability estimates have not been determined in a way a social scientist would expect. Few psychometric data were used to estimate the validity and reliability of the FMCE instrument. This study used several methods to estimate the reliability and structural validity of the FMCE instrument. Data from the first semester of a non-calculus physics course was used to calculate Cronbach alpha reliability estimates and, using factor analysis, evaluate the construct validity of the instrument. For the pilot study, the pretest was given to 38 students and the post-test to 20. Fifty-four students participated in the fall 2002 pretest. A table of specifications also was used to estimate the content validity of the FMCE. The pilot study suggested that the FMCE is a valid and reliable measure of the concepts of force and motion, and the ongoing study will provide further investigation.
Series Name:  ERIC Database
Issue ED471542
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Education - Basic Research
- Assessment
= Instruments
- Lower Undergraduate
- High School
- Reference Material
= Report
= Research study
PER-Central Type Intended Users Ratings
- PER Literature
- Researchers
- Educators
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Format:
application/pdf
Access Rights:
Free access
Restriction:
© 2002 Susan Ramlo
Keywords:
reliability test, validity test
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created October 28, 2014 by Bruce Mason
Record Updated:
August 19, 2020 by Lyle Barbato
Last Update
when Cataloged:
October 1, 2002
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
S. Ramlo, , ERIC Database, Report No. ED471542, 2002, WWW Document, (https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED471542).
AJP/PRST-PER
S. Ramlo, The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation, ERIC Database, Report No. ED471542, 2002, <https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED471542>.
APA Format
Ramlo, S. (2002). The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation (Report No. ED471542). Retrieved December 5, 2024, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED471542
Chicago Format
Ramlo, Susan. "The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation." In ERIC Database, 17. 2002. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED471542 (accessed 5 December 2024).
MLA Format
Ramlo, Susan. The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation. 2002. 5 Dec. 2024 <https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED471542>.
BibTeX Export Format
@techreport{ Author = "Susan Ramlo", Title = {The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation}, Number = {ED471542}, Month = {October}, Year = {2002} }
Refer Export Format

%A Susan Ramlo %T The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation %R ED471542 %S ERIC Database %D October 1, 2002 %P 17 %U https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED471542 %O application/pdf

EndNote Export Format

%0 Report %A Ramlo, Susan %D October 1, 2002 %T The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation %N ED471542 %P 17 %8 October 1, 2002 %@ ED471542 %U https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED471542


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The AJP/PRST-PER presented is based on the AIP Style with the addition of journal article titles and conference proceeding article titles.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Save to my folders

Contribute

Similar Materials