Journal Article Detail Page
written by
Matthew Mears
The Force Concept Inventory (FCI) is widely used to investigate the effect of education level on conceptual understanding of Newtonian mechanics but has only recently been scrutinized for gender effects and retention. This study examines both the gender gap in first year physics undergraduates compared to the gap for nonphysicists and the FCI retention after three months. All participants were either studying or working at the University of Sheffield in the UK and had completed a similar compulsory level of secondary education. As expected the results show that a greater level of education in physics is associated with a larger average FCI score. However, further analysis shows that there exists a gender gap at all levels of education. The size of the effect of gender is quantified using Cohen's d and ranges from 0.84 to 1.17 which indicates a large effect due to gender for all levels of education. Despite the FCI having been used as a tool to measure learning gains immediately following instruction in Newtonian mechanics there has been little work to investigate whether this increase in FCI score remains after some time has elapsed. Here the increase in FCI scores is found to remain increased after a three month absence of mechanics-related teaching, and that this retention of FCI scores is independent of gender. Despite this, the gender gap still remains large and statistically significant after the three month delay.
Physical Review Physics Education Research: Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 020135
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!
Record Link
<a href="https://www.per-central.org/items/detail.cfm?ID=15186">Mears, Matthew. "Gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory for different educational levels in the United Kingdom." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, no. 2, (October 8, 2019): 020135.</a>
AIP Format
M. Mears, , Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15 (2), 020135 (2019), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020135).
AJP/PRST-PER
M. Mears, Gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory for different educational levels in the United Kingdom, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15 (2), 020135 (2019), <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020135>.
APA Format
Mears, M. (2019, October 8). Gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory for different educational levels in the United Kingdom. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., 15(2), 020135. Retrieved December 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020135
Chicago Format
Mears, Matthew. "Gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory for different educational levels in the United Kingdom." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, no. 2, (October 8, 2019): 020135, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020135 (accessed 10 December 2024).
MLA Format
Mears, Matthew. "Gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory for different educational levels in the United Kingdom." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15.2 (2019): 020135. 10 Dec. 2024 <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020135>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{
Author = "Matthew Mears",
Title = {Gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory for different educational levels in the United Kingdom},
Journal = {Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.},
Volume = {15},
Number = {2},
Pages = {020135},
Month = {October},
Year = {2019}
}
Refer Export Format
%A Matthew Mears %T Gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory for different educational levels in the United Kingdom %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 15 %N 2 %D October 8, 2019 %P 020135 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020135 %O application/pdf
EndNote Export Format
%0 Journal Article %A Mears, Matthew %D October 8, 2019 %T Gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory for different educational levels in the United Kingdom %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 15 %N 2 %P 020135 %8 October 8, 2019 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020135 Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.
Citation Source Information
The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual. The AJP/PRST-PER presented is based on the AIP Style with the addition of journal article titles and conference proceeding article titles. The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References. The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation. The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ. |