home - login - register

Journal Article Detail Page

Physical Review Physics Education Research
written by James E. Wells, Rachel Henderson, John Stewart, Gay Stewart, Jie Yang, and Adrienne L. Traxler
Module analysis for multiple-choice responses (MAMCR) was applied to a large sample of Force Concept Inventory (FCI) pretest and post-test responses (Npre = 4509 and Npost = 4716) to replicate the results of the original MAMCR study and to understand the origins of the gender differences reported in a previous study of this dataset. When the results of MAMCR could not be replicated, a modification of the method was introduced, modified module analysis (MMA). MMA was productive in understanding the structure of the incorrect answers in the FCI, identifying 9 groups of incorrect answers on the pretest and 11 groups on the post-test. These groups, in most cases, could be mapped on to common misconceptions used by the authors of the FCI to create distractors for the instrument. Of these incorrect answer groups, 6 of the pretest groups and 8 of the post-test groups were the same for men and women. Two of the male-only pretest groups disappeared with instruction while the third male-only pretest group was identified for both men and women postinstruction. Three of the groups identified for both men and women on the post-test were not present for either on the pretest. The rest of the identified incorrect answer groups did not represent misconceptions, but were rather related to the blocked structure of some FCI items where multiple items are related to a common stem. The groups identified had little relation to the gender unfair items previously identified for this dataset, and therefore, differences in the structure of student misconceptions between men and women cannot explain the gender differences reported for the FCI.
Physical Review Physics Education Research: Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 020122
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Classical Mechanics
- General
Education - Basic Research
- Assessment
= Conceptual Assessment
= Instruments
- Research Design & Methodology
= Data
= Validity
- Sample Population
= Gender
- Student Characteristics
= Ability
= Skills
General Physics
- Physics Education Research
- Lower Undergraduate
- Reference Material
= Research study
PER-Central Type Intended Users Ratings
- PER Literature
- Researchers
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Formats:
application/pdf
text/html
Access Rights:
Free access
License:
This material is released under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.
Rights Holder:
American Physical Society
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020122
NSF Number:
PHY-0108787
Keywords:
FCI validation, FCI validity
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created October 24, 2019 by Lyle Barbato
Record Updated:
May 29, 2022 by Caroline Hall
Last Update
when Cataloged:
September 3, 2019
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
J. Wells, R. Henderson, J. Stewart, G. Stewart, J. Yang, and A. Traxler, , Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15 (2), 020122 (2019), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020122).
AJP/PRST-PER
J. Wells, R. Henderson, J. Stewart, G. Stewart, J. Yang, and A. Traxler, Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15 (2), 020122 (2019), <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020122>.
APA Format
Wells, J., Henderson, R., Stewart, J., Stewart, G., Yang, J., & Traxler, A. (2019, September 3). Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., 15(2), 020122. Retrieved December 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020122
Chicago Format
Wells, J, R. Henderson, J. Stewart, G. Stewart, J. Yang, and A. Traxler. "Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, no. 2, (September 3, 2019): 020122, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020122 (accessed 10 December 2024).
MLA Format
Wells, James E., Rachel Henderson, John Stewart, Gay Stewart, Jie Yang, and Adrienne Traxler. "Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15.2 (2019): 020122. 10 Dec. 2024 <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020122>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{ Author = "James E. Wells and Rachel Henderson and John Stewart and Gay Stewart and Jie Yang and Adrienne Traxler", Title = {Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis}, Journal = {Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.}, Volume = {15}, Number = {2}, Pages = {020122}, Month = {September}, Year = {2019} }
Refer Export Format

%A James E. Wells %A Rachel Henderson %A John Stewart %A Gay Stewart %A Jie Yang %A Adrienne Traxler %T Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 15 %N 2 %D September 3, 2019 %P 020122 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020122 %O application/pdf

EndNote Export Format

%0 Journal Article %A Wells, James E. %A Henderson, Rachel %A Stewart, John %A Stewart, Gay %A Yang, Jie %A Traxler, Adrienne %D September 3, 2019 %T Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 15 %N 2 %P 020122 %8 September 3, 2019 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020122


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The AJP/PRST-PER presented is based on the AIP Style with the addition of journal article titles and conference proceeding article titles.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Save to my folders

Contribute

Similar Materials