home - login - register

Journal Article Detail Page

Physical Review Physics Education Research
written by Stephanie Viola Chasteen and Rajendra Chattergoon
Effective faculty professional development must be participant centered; tailored to the needs and interests of the faculty who engage in it. In order to better understand those needs and interests, we investigate how knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and teaching practice vary among new physics faculty, using surveys of a large sample (n = 442)of participants in the Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop (NFW). The "innovation-decision model" guides our understanding of the evolution of faculty teaching practice, and "self-determination theory" and the "theory of planned behavior" inform our understanding of necessary preconditions for that change. We find that most new physics faculty are aware of published teaching approaches, but that this awareness has not increased compared to a decade and is lower than the experienced faculty in our sample. New physics faculty also value student-centered instruction, are interested in using it, and feel that there is peer support for using student-centered instruction. Some new faculty have experienced student-centered instruction as a student or teaching assistant. They are not confident of their ability to enact such practices, however, showing that self-efficacy is an important target for faculty learning. Overall, our results suggest a continued shift in norms in the physics community, such that most new physics faculty enter the professoriate needing minimal encouragement to try student-centered instruction, having already experienced and experimented with such techniques. We do find, however, that about that about 20% of new faculty are not as open to student-centered instruction and have not yet experimented with it, and that more of these faculty are at Ph.D.-granting institutions. We recommend those creating professional development experiences for faculty explore opportunities to support faculty as agentic learners by helping them develop self-efficacy, agency, and metacognition.
Physical Review Physics Education Research: Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 020164
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Education - Applied Research
- Active Learning
- Professional Development
Education - Basic Research
- Sample Population
= Instructor: Faculty
- Teacher Characteristics
= Affect
= Pedagogical Content Knowledge
General Physics
- Physics Education Research
- Professional Development
- Reference Material
= Research study
PER-Central Type Intended Users Ratings
- PER Literature
- Professional/Practitioners
- Administrators
- Researchers
- Educators
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Formats:
application/pdf
text/html
Access Rights:
Free access
License:
This material is released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
Rights Holder:
American Physical Society
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020164
NSF Number:
DUE-1431638
Keywords:
Attitudes and Beliefs About Active Learning, EBIP, Evidence-Based Instructional Practice, physics attitudes
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created May 12, 2021 by Bruce Mason
Record Updated:
October 30, 2022 by Caroline Hall
Last Update
when Cataloged:
December 28, 2020
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
S. Chasteen and R. Chattergoon, , Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16 (2), 020164 (2020), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020164).
AJP/PRST-PER
S. Chasteen and R. Chattergoon, Insights from the Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop: How do new physics faculty teach?, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16 (2), 020164 (2020), <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020164>.
APA Format
Chasteen, S., & Chattergoon, R. (2020, December 28). Insights from the Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop: How do new physics faculty teach?. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., 16(2), 020164. Retrieved May 19, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020164
Chicago Format
Chasteen, Stephanie Viola, and Rajendra Chattergoon. "Insights from the Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop: How do new physics faculty teach?." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, no. 2, (December 28, 2020): 020164, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020164 (accessed 19 May 2026).
MLA Format
Chasteen, Stephanie Viola, and Rajendra Chattergoon. "Insights from the Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop: How do new physics faculty teach?." Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16.2 (2020): 020164. 19 May 2026 <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020164>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{ Author = "Stephanie Viola Chasteen and Rajendra Chattergoon", Title = {Insights from the Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop: How do new physics faculty teach?}, Journal = {Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.}, Volume = {16}, Number = {2}, Pages = {020164}, Month = {December}, Year = {2020} }
Refer Export Format

%A Stephanie Viola Chasteen %A Rajendra Chattergoon %T Insights from the Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop: How do new physics faculty teach? %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 16 %N 2 %D December 28, 2020 %P 020164 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020164 %O application/pdf

EndNote Export Format

%0 Journal Article %A Chasteen, Stephanie Viola %A Chattergoon, Rajendra %D December 28, 2020 %T Insights from the Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop: How do new physics faculty teach? %J Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. %V 16 %N 2 %P 020164 %8 December 28, 2020 %U https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020164


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The AJP/PRST-PER presented is based on the AIP Style with the addition of journal article titles and conference proceeding article titles.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Save to my folders

Contribute

Similar Materials