Journal Article Detail Page
written by
Vincent P. Coletta and Jeffrey A. Phillips
This paper examines normalized gains and preinstruction scores on the force concept inventory (FCI) for students in interactive engagement courses in introductory mechanics at four universities and found a significant, positive correlation for three of them. We also examined class average FCI scores of 2948 students in 38 interactive engagement classes, 31 of which were from the same four universities and 7 of which came from 3 other schools. We found a significant, positive correlation between class average normalized FCI gains and class average preinstruction scores. To probe this correlation, we administered Lawson's classroom test of scientific reasoning to 65 students and found a significant, positive correlation between these students' normalized FCI gains and their Lawson test scores. This correlation is even stronger than the correlation between FCI gains and preinstruction FCI scores. Our study demonstrates that differences in student populations are important when comparing normalized gains in different interactive engagement classes. We suggest using the Lawson test along with the FCI to measure the effectiveness of alternative interactive engagement strategies.
American Journal of Physics: Volume 73, Issue 11, Pages 1172-1182
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!
Record Link
<a href="https://www.per-central.org/items/detail.cfm?ID=16011">Coletta, Vincent, and Jeffrey A. Phillips. "Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability." Am. J. Phys. 73, no. 11, (November 29, 2005): 1172-1182.</a>
AIP Format
V. Coletta and J. Phillips, , Am. J. Phys. 73 (11), 1172 (2005), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2117109).
AJP/PRST-PER
V. Coletta and J. Phillips, Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability, Am. J. Phys. 73 (11), 1172 (2005), <https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2117109>.
APA Format
Coletta, V., & Phillips, J. (2005, November 29). Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability. Am. J. Phys., 73(11), 1172-1182. Retrieved September 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2117109
Chicago Format
Coletta, Vincent, and Jeffrey A. Phillips. "Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability." Am. J. Phys. 73, no. 11, (November 29, 2005): 1172-1182, https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2117109 (accessed 10 September 2024).
MLA Format
Coletta, Vincent, and Jeffrey A. Phillips. "Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability." Am. J. Phys. 73.11 (2005): 1172-1182. 10 Sep. 2024 <https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2117109>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{
Author = "Vincent Coletta and Jeffrey A. Phillips",
Title = {Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability},
Journal = {Am. J. Phys.},
Volume = {73},
Number = {11},
Pages = {1172-1182},
Month = {November},
Year = {2005}
}
Refer Export Format
%A Vincent Coletta %A Jeffrey A. Phillips %T Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability %J Am. J. Phys. %V 73 %N 11 %D November 29, 2005 %P 1172-1182 %U https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2117109 %O application/pdf
EndNote Export Format
%0 Journal Article %A Coletta, Vincent %A Phillips, Jeffrey A. %D November 29, 2005 %T Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability %J Am. J. Phys. %V 73 %N 11 %P 1172-1182 %8 November 29, 2005 %U https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2117109 Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.
Citation Source Information
The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual. The AJP/PRST-PER presented is based on the AIP Style with the addition of journal article titles and conference proceeding article titles. The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References. The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation. The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ. Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability:
Has Version Of
FCI normalized gain, scientific reasoning ability, thinking in physics, and gender effects
Link to the PERC Proceeding paper which is based on this research paper. relation by Caroline HallKnow of another related resource? Login to relate this resource to it. |
ContributeRelated MaterialsSimilar Materials |