home - login - register

Journal Article Detail Page

Cognition and Instruction
written by Randi A. Engle and Faith R. Conant
This article suggests that productive disciplinary engagement can be fostered by designing learning environments that support (a) problematizing subject matter, (b) giving students authority to address such problems, (c) holding students accountable to others and to shared disciplinary norms, and (d) providing students with relevant resources. To provide empirical support for this suggestion, we use these 4 guiding principles to explain a case of productive disciplinary engagement from a Fostering Communities of Learners classroom. We use the principles to understand 1 group of students' emergent and sustained controversy over a species' classification. The students became passionately engaged, used evidence in scholarly ways, developed several arguments, and generated questions regarding biological classification. We propose the controversy as an example of productive disciplinary engagement, and show how it was supported by: the treatment of the classification as a legitimate problem by the students and teacher; the students having the authority to resolve the issue for themselves while being held accountable to relevant contributions from peers and outside sources as well as to classroom disciplinary norms for using evidence; and students having access to multiple sources of information, models of argumentation, and other relevant resources. The article closes by reflecting on the generality of the principles, showing how they can be used to understand 2 other cases of productive disciplinary engagement from the literature on reform programs in science and mathematics. By specifying differences as well as similarities in the ways the principles were embodied in these cases, the article may provide learning designers with a landscape of possibilities for promoting the specific kinds of productive disciplinary engagement that they most value.
Cognition and Instruction: Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 399-483
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Education - Applied Research
- Active Learning
= Inquiry Learning
- Learning Environment
Education - Basic Research
- Behavior
- Communication
= Language
= Speaking
- Student Characteristics
= Affect
= Skills
Other Sciences
- Life Sciences
- High School
- Reference Material
= Article
PER-Central Type Intended Users Ratings
- PER Literature
- Administrators
- Professional/Practitioners
- Researchers
- Educators
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Format:
text/html
Access Rights:
Available by subscription and
Available for purchase
Restriction:
© 2002 Informa UK, Ltd.
DOI:
10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
Keywords:
community of learners, dialectic discourse, inquiry, learner-centered classroom, student motivation
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created July 6, 2022 by Lauren Bauman
Record Updated:
September 16, 2022 by Caroline Hall
Last Update
when Cataloged:
January 1, 2002
ComPADRE is beta testing Citation Styles!

Record Link
AIP Format
R. Engle and F. Conant, , Cog. Instr. 20 (4), 399 (2002), WWW Document, (https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2004_1).
AJP/PRST-PER
R. Engle and F. Conant, Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom, Cog. Instr. 20 (4), 399 (2002), <https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2004_1>.
APA Format
Engle, R., & Conant, F. (2002, January 1). Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom. Cog. Instr., 20(4), 399-483. Retrieved November 26, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2004_1
Chicago Format
Engle, Randi A., and Faith R. Conant. "Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom." Cog. Instr. 20, no. 4, (January 1, 2002): 399-483, https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2004_1 (accessed 26 November 2022).
MLA Format
Engle, Randi A., and Faith R. Conant. "Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom." Cog. Instr. 20.4 (2002): 399-483. 26 Nov. 2022 <https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2004_1>.
BibTeX Export Format
@article{ Author = "Randi A. Engle and Faith R. Conant", Title = {Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom}, Journal = {Cog. Instr.}, Volume = {20}, Number = {4}, Pages = {399-483}, Month = {January}, Year = {2002} }
Refer Export Format

%A Randi A. Engle %A Faith R. Conant %T Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom %J Cog. Instr. %V 20 %N 4 %D January 1, 2002 %P 399-483 %U https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2004_1 %O text/html

EndNote Export Format

%0 Journal Article %A Engle, Randi A. %A Conant, Faith R. %D January 1, 2002 %T Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom %J Cog. Instr. %V 20 %N 4 %P 399-483 %8 January 1, 2002 %U https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2004_1


Disclaimer: ComPADRE offers citation styles as a guide only. We cannot offer interpretations about citations as this is an automated procedure. Please refer to the style manuals in the Citation Source Information area for clarifications.

Citation Source Information

The AIP Style presented is based on information from the AIP Style Manual.

The AJP/PRST-PER presented is based on the AIP Style with the addition of journal article titles and conference proceeding article titles.

The APA Style presented is based on information from APA Style.org: Electronic References.

The Chicago Style presented is based on information from Examples of Chicago-Style Documentation.

The MLA Style presented is based on information from the MLA FAQ.

Save to my folders

Contribute

Similar Materials