Materials Similar to Student Interpretation of the Signs of Definite Integrals Using Graphical Representations
- 56%: Assessing students' ability to solve introductory physics problems using integrals in symbolic and graphical representations
- 47%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
- 43%: Student-generated content: Using PeerWise to enhance engagement and outcomes in introductory physics courses
- 41%: Student Difficulties with Graphical Representations of Negative Values of Velocity
- 41%: Analysis of Student Understanding of Statics Principles
- 41%: Comparing Student Use of Mathematical and Physical Vector Representations
- 41%: Changing Student Conceptions of Newton's Laws Using Interactive Video Vignettes
- 40%: Using Johnson-Laird's cognitive framework of sense-making to characterize engineering students' mental representations in kinematics
- 40%: Student difficulties in translating between mathematical and graphical representations in introductory physics
- 40%: Using multiple survey questions about energy to uncover elements of middle school student reasoning
- 39%: Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs
- 39%: Using the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory to Investigate College students' Pre-instructional Mental Models of Lunar Phases
- 39%: Comparing students' performance on research-based conceptual assessments and traditional classroom assessments
- 39%: Using conceptual blending to describe how students use mathematical integrals in physics
- 38%: Modeling students’ conceptual understanding of force, velocity, and acceleration
- 38%: Addressing Student Difficulties with Buoyancy
- 38%: Testing Students’ Understanding of Vector Concepts
- 37%: Investigation of Student Difficulties with Graphical Representations in Physics
- 37%: Conceptual Understanding of Resistive Electric Circuits Among First-year Engineering Students