Materials Similar to FCI normalized gain, scientific reasoning ability, thinking in physics, and gender effects
- 64%: Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability
- 41%: Predicting FCI gain with a nonverbal intelligence test
- 39%: Learning of content knowledge and development of scientific reasoning ability: A cross culture comparison
- 38%: Reducing the FCI Gender Gap
- 37%: Comparing Traditional and Studio Courses through FCI Gains and Losses
- 36%: Gender disparities in second-semester college physics: The incremental effects of a "smog of bias"
- 36%: What can normalized gain reveal about individual learning on the FCI?
- 36%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
- 35%: Development and validation of a scientific (formal) reasoning test for college students
- 35%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
- 35%: Gender Differences in Learning of the Concept of Force, Representational Consistency, and Scientific Reasoning
- 33%: Preliminary investigation of instructor effects on gender gap in introductory physics
- 33%: Making classroom assessment more accountable to scientific reasoning: A case for attending to mechanistic thinking
- 33%: Evaluating students’ performance on the FCI at a minority serving institution
- 32%: A comparison of the impact of 3 forms of "hands-on" activities for learners with different scientific reasoning abilities
- 32%: Effect of gender, self-efficacy, and interest on perception of the learning environment and outcomes in calculus-based introductory physics courses
- 31%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
- 31%: Developing a magnetism conceptual survey and assessing gender differences in student understanding of magnetism
- 31%: Replicating a self-affirmation intervention to address gender differences: Successes and challenges
