Materials Similar to Applying Rasch theory to evaluate the construct validity of brief electricity and magnetism assessment
- 52%: Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism
- 46%: Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism: Analysis of the items and recommendations for improvement
- 45%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
- 44%: Multidimensional Item Response Theory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
- 41%: Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment
- 39%: Multiple-Response Assessment for Upper-division Electrodynamics
- 39%: Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs: concurrent validity
- 39%: Assessing the assessment: Mutual information between response choices and factor scores
- 38%: A Research-Based Approach to Assessing Student Learning Issues in Upper-Division Electricity & Magnetism
- 38%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
- 37%: Methodological development of a new coding scheme for an established assessment on measurement uncertainty in laboratory courses
- 36%: Assessing students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism
- 36%: Resource Letter RBAI-1: Research-Based Assessment Instruments in Physics and Astronomy
- 36%: Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment
- 36%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 35%: Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms
- 35%: What can normalized gain reveal about individual learning on the FCI?
- 35%: Resource Letter RBAI-2: Research-based assessment instruments: Beyond physics topics
- 35%: Criteria for collapsing rating scale responses: A case study of the CLASS
