Materials Similar to Establishing reliability and validity: An ongoing process
- 56%: Applying Rasch theory to evaluate the construct validity of brief electricity and magnetism assessment
- 53%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 46%: Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs: concurrent validity
- 45%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
- 44%: Aspects of Validity in Quantitative Research
- 44%: Validity and reliability of the force and motion conceptual evaluation
- 42%: Exploratory factor analysis of the QMCA
- 41%: Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions
- 40%: Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts
- 39%: Do Concept Inventories Actually Measure Anything?
- 39%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
- 39%: Evaluation of the Translated Version of the FMCE
- 39%: Assessing the assessment: Mutual information between response choices and factor scores
- 39%: Criteria for collapsing rating scale responses: A case study of the CLASS
- 38%: Investigating the Validity of the MPEX Survey
- 38%: Quantum Mechanics Survey (QMS)
- 38%: Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism
- 38%: Development of a General Undergraduate Estimation Skills Survey (GUESS)
- 38%: Coupled multiple-response versus free-response conceptual assessment: An example from upper-division physics
