Materials Similar to Validity and reliability of the force and motion conceptual evaluation
- 80%: The Reliability of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 68%: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 65%: Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula
- 64%: Rural and First Generation Performance Differences on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 63%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
- 60%: What does the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation pretest measure?
- 52%: Applying a resources framework to analysis of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 46%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 46%: Design and Evaluation of a Natural Language Tutor for Force and Motion
- 45%: Modeling students’ conceptual understanding of force, velocity, and acceleration
- 41%: The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported physics instruction
- 41%: Conceptual Dynamics: Following Changing Student Views of Force and Motion
- 41%: Evaluation of the Impact of the New Physics Curriculum on the Conceptual Profiles of Secondary Students
- 40%: Conceptual development about motion and force in elementary and middle school students
- 40%: Transformative Experiences and Conceptual Understanding of Force and Motion
- 39%: Rotational and Rolling Motion Conceptual Survey
- 38%: Common Concerns About the Force Concept Inventory
- 37%: Symmetry and Gauss's Law Conceptual Evaluation
