Materials Similar to The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 96%: The Reliability of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 92%: Validity and reliability of the force and motion conceptual evaluation
- 90%: Rural and First Generation Performance Differences on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 89%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
- 86%: Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula
- 85%: What does the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation pretest measure?
- 74%: Applying a resources framework to analysis of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 67%: Design and Evaluation of a Natural Language Tutor for Force and Motion
- 64%: Modeling students’ conceptual understanding of force, velocity, and acceleration
- 64%: Evaluation of the Impact of the New Physics Curriculum on the Conceptual Profiles of Secondary Students
- 58%: Transformative Experiences and Conceptual Understanding of Force and Motion
- 57%: Conceptual Dynamics: Following Changing Student Views of Force and Motion
- 56%: Rotational and Rolling Motion Conceptual Survey
- 54%: Conceptual development about motion and force in elementary and middle school students
- 51%: The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported physics instruction
- 50%: Evaluation of Instruction Using the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism in Mexico
- 50%: Introductory Physics Students Retention of Conceptual Understanding of Forces
- 49%: Comparing students' performance on research-based conceptual assessments and traditional classroom assessments
