Materials Similar to The Reliability of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 85%: Validity and reliability of the force and motion conceptual evaluation
- 83%: Rural and First Generation Performance Differences on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 77%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
- 76%: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 70%: What does the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation pretest measure?
- 69%: Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula
- 58%: Modeling students’ conceptual understanding of force, velocity, and acceleration
- 57%: Rotational and Rolling Motion Conceptual Survey
- 57%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 55%: Applying a resources framework to analysis of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 50%: Design and Evaluation of a Natural Language Tutor for Force and Motion
- 49%: Evaluation of the Impact of the New Physics Curriculum on the Conceptual Profiles of Secondary Students
- 48%: Comparing students' performance on research-based conceptual assessments and traditional classroom assessments
- 48%: Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism: Analysis of the items and recommendations for improvement
- 48%: Introductory Physics Students Retention of Conceptual Understanding of Forces
- 47%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
- 46%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
- 46%: Conceptual Understanding of Resistive Electric Circuits Among First-year Engineering Students
- 46%: Development and Implementation of a Conceptual Survey in Thermodynamics
