Materials Similar to Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
- 48%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
- 44%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
- 42%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
- 41%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
- 41%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
- 38%: The Force Concept Inventory: A tool for monitoring student learning
- 38%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
- 38%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 37%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
- 37%: Racial and ethnic bias in the Force Concept Inventory
- 37%: Gender Differences in Both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance
- 36%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
- 36%: Gender & LEAP Pedagogy: What Does The Gender Force Concept Inventory Have To Say?
- 35%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
- 34%: Conceptual coherence of non-Newtonian worldviews in Force Concept Inventory data
- 33%: Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
- 33%: Force concept inventory
- 33%: Talking and learning physics: Predicting future grades from network measures and Force Concept Inventory pretest scores
- 33%: Sensitivity of Learning Gains on the Force Concept Inventory to Students’ Individual Epistemological Changes
