Materials Similar to Revealing Differences Between Curricula Using the Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics Diagnostic
- 61%: Tapping into Juniors’ Understanding of E&M: The Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics (CUE) Diagnostic
- 60%: Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics diagnostic: A conceptual assessment for the junior level
- 49%: Colorado Upper Division Electrostatics (CUE) Assessment
- 40%: Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms
- 40%: Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism
- 40%: Multiple-Response Assessment for Upper-division Electrodynamics
- 37%: Transforming Upper-Division Quantum Mechanics: Learning Goals and Assessment
- 37%: A Research-Based Approach to Assessing Student Learning Issues in Upper-Division Electricity & Magnetism
- 37%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
- 35%: Coupled multiple-response versus free-response conceptual assessment: An example from upper-division physics
- 33%: Assessment feedback: A tool to promote scientific practices in upper-division
- 33%: Identifying Differences in Diagnostic Skills between Physics Students: Developing a Rubric
- 31%: Correlating Student Beliefs with Student Learning Using the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey
- 30%: Constructing a Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Quantum Physics from an Open-ended Tool
- 30%: Using student-generated content to engage students in upper-division quantum mechanics
- 29%: Rural and First Generation Performance Differences on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 29%: But Does It Last? Sustaining a Research-Based Curriculum in Upper-Division Electricity & Magnetism
- 29%: Research-Based Course Materials and Assessments for Upper-Division Electrodynamics (E&M II)
- 29%: Standing fast: Translation among durable representations using evanescent representations in upper-division problem solving
