Materials Similar to Gender & LEAP Pedagogy: What Does The Gender Force Concept Inventory Have To Say?
- 87%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
- 84%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
- 74%: Gender Differences in Both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance
- 69%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
- 68%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
- 68%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
- 68%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
- 68%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
- 68%: Racial and ethnic bias in the Force Concept Inventory
- 66%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 62%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
- 61%: Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
- 60%: Force concept inventory
- 60%: The effect of distracters on student performance on the Force Concept Inventory
- 59%: Developing the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory
- 58%: Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller
- 58%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
- 58%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
- 58%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
