Materials Similar to Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
- 68%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
- 56%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
- 53%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
- 52%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 51%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
- 51%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
- 49%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
- 48%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
- 48%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
- 44%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
- 44%: Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts
- 44%: Racial and ethnic bias in the Force Concept Inventory
- 43%: Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
- 43%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 42%: Force concept inventory
- 42%: The effect of distracters on student performance on the Force Concept Inventory
- 42%: Developing the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory
- 41%: Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller
- 40%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
