Materials Similar to Validation and analysis of the coupled multiple response Colorado upper-division electrostatics diagnostic
- 56%: Tapping into Juniors’ Understanding of E&M: The Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics (CUE) Diagnostic
- 52%: Revealing Differences Between Curricula Using the Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics Diagnostic
- 51%: Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics diagnostic: A conceptual assessment for the junior level
- 51%: Multiple-Response Assessment for Upper-division Electrodynamics
- 47%: Coupled multiple-response versus free-response conceptual assessment: An example from upper-division physics
- 43%: Colorado Upper Division Electrostatics (CUE) Assessment
- 42%: Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism
- 42%: Creating a coupled multiple response assessment for modeling in lab courses
- 41%: Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms
- 41%: Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis
- 39%: Analysis of Individual Test Of Astronomy STandards (TOAST) Item Responses
- 37%: Assessing learning outcomes in middle-division classical mechanics: The Colorado Classical Mechanics and Math Methods Instrument
- 37%: Assessing student reasoning in upper-division electricity and magnetism at Oregon State University
- 37%: Analysis to Develop Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Force Concept Inventory
- 36%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
- 36%: Designing upper-division thermal physics assessment items informed by faculty perspectives of key content coverage
- 36%: Identifying a preinstruction to postinstruction factor model for the Force Concept Inventory within a multitrait item response theory framework
- 35%: Development and uses of upper-division conceptual assessments
- 35%: Preliminary development and validation of a diagnostic of critical thinking for introductory physics labs
