Materials Similar to Assessing student reasoning in upper-division electricity and magnetism at Oregon State University
- 57%: A Research-Based Approach to Assessing Student Learning Issues in Upper-Division Electricity & Magnetism
- 55%: Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Electricity and Magnetism
- 47%: Assessing students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism
- 45%: Applying Rasch theory to evaluate the construct validity of brief electricity and magnetism assessment
- 43%: Assessing Student Learning in Middle-Division Classical Mechanics/Math Methods
- 43%: Assessing the longitudinal measurement invariance of the Force Concept Inventory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
- 42%: Multiple-Response Assessment for Upper-division Electrodynamics
- 42%: Using psychometric tools as a window into students’ quantitative reasoning in introductory physics
- 41%: Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism: Analysis of the items and recommendations for improvement
- 40%: Assessing the assessment: Mutual information between response choices and factor scores
- 39%: Multidimensional item response theory and the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment
- 38%: Applying module analysis to the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
- 37%: Tapping into Juniors’ Understanding of E&M: The Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics (CUE) Diagnostic
- 37%: Observations on student difficulties with mathematics in upper-division electricity and magnetism
- 36%: Longitudinal study of student conceptual understanding in electricity and magnetism
- 36%: Multidimensional Item Response Theory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
- 36%: Evolution in student conceptual understanding of electricity and magnetism
- 35%: But Does It Last? Sustaining a Research-Based Curriculum in Upper-Division Electricity & Magnetism
- 35%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
