Materials Similar to Comparing Two Activities’ Effectiveness Improving Reasoning with Multiple-Variable Information
- 57%: Comparing Student Ability to Reason with Multiple Variables for Graphed and Non-Graphed Information.
- 35%: A comparison of the impact of 3 forms of "hands-on" activities for learners with different scientific reasoning abilities
- 34%: Comparing Mechanistic Reasoning in Open and Guided Inquiry Physics Activities
- 30%: Comparing Student Learning with Multiple Research-Based Conceptual Surveys: CSEM and BEMA
- 30%: Exploration of factors that affect the comparative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives in an undergraduate laboratory
- 29%: Using multiple survey questions about energy to uncover elements of middle school student reasoning
- 28%: Development of Scientific Reasoning in College Biology: Do Two Levels of General Hypothesis-Testing Skills Exist?
- 27%: Comparing Student Learning in Mechanics Using Simulations and Hands-on Activities
- 27%: Improving instruction in mechanics through identification and elicitation of pivotal cases in student reasoning
- 27%: Student Understanding of the Correlation between Hands- on Activities and Computer Visualizations of NMR/MRI
- 27%: Comparing the Effectiveness of Research-based Curricula for Teaching Introductory Mechanics
- 27%: Multiple tools for visualizing equipotential surfaces: Optimizing for instructional goals
- 27%: Evaluating the effectiveness of two methods to improve students' problem solving performance after studying an online tutorial
- 26%: Investigating the effectiveness of the tutorials in introductory physics in multiple instructional settings
- 26%: Design Principles to Support Physics and Engineering Learning in Complementary Classrooms and Field Trip Activities
- 25%: Investigating student ability to follow and interact with reasoning chains
- 24%: Improving Students' Understanding of Quantum Mechanics
- 24%: University students' reasoning on physical information encoded in quantum state at a point in time
- 24%: Expert reasoning about independent and dependent variables in thermodynamics
