Materials Similar to Conceptual coherence of non-Newtonian worldviews in Force Concept Inventory data
- 53%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
- 50%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
- 49%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
- 49%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
- 49%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
- 49%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
- 49%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
- 49%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
- 48%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 47%: Development of the Newtonian Gravity Concept Inventory
- 44%: Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
- 44%: Racial and ethnic bias in the Force Concept Inventory
- 43%: Force concept inventory
- 43%: The effect of distracters on student performance on the Force Concept Inventory
- 42%: Developing the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory
- 42%: Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller
- 42%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
- 42%: High school students' conceptual coherence of qualitative knowledge in the case of the force concept
- 42%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
