Materials Similar to Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs: concurrent validity
- 57%: Preliminary development and validation of a diagnostic of critical thinking for introductory physics labs
- 51%: Applying Rasch theory to evaluate the construct validity of brief electricity and magnetism assessment
- 46%: Measuring the impact of introductory physics labs on learning and critical thinking
- 45%: Development of the Concise Data Processing Assessment
- 45%: Criteria for collapsing rating scale responses: A case study of the CLASS
- 44%: Interview Validation of the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking (PLIC)
- 43%: Assessing the assessment: Mutual information between response choices and factor scores
- 41%: Establishing reliability and validity: An ongoing process
- 41%: Quantifying critical thinking: Development and validation of the physics lab inventory of critical thinking
- 39%: Showing the dynamics of student thinking as measured by the FMCE
- 39%: Development of a General Undergraduate Estimation Skills Survey (GUESS)
- 39%: Developing Quantitative Critical Thinking in the Introductory Physics Lab
- 39%: Using psychometric tools as a window into students’ quantitative reasoning in introductory physics
- 38%: Development and results from a survey on students’ views of experiments in lab classes and research
- 38%: Towards quantification of the FCI’s validity: the effect of false positives
- 37%: Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions
- 37%: Methodological development of a new coding scheme for an established assessment on measurement uncertainty in laboratory courses
- 37%: Creating a coupled multiple response assessment for modeling in lab courses
- 36%: Aspects of Validity in Quantitative Research
