Materials Similar to Gender fairness within the Force Concept Inventory
- 74%: Gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory for different educational levels in the United Kingdom
- 73%: Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis
- 68%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
- 64%: Analysis to Develop Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Force Concept Inventory
- 64%: Force Concept Inventory: More than just conceptual understanding
- 63%: Evidence of measurement invariance across gender for the Force Concept Inventory
- 63%: Bias on the Force Concept Inventory across the intersection of gender and race
- 63%: Analyzing the measurement error from false positives in the Force Concept Inventory
- 60%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
- 60%: Exploring the gender gap in the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism
- 59%: Confirmatory factor analysis applied to the Force Concept Inventory
- 58%: Gender & LEAP Pedagogy: What Does The Gender Force Concept Inventory Have To Say?
- 56%: Extending modified module analysis to include correct responses: Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 55%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
- 55%: Optimizing the length of computerized adaptive testing for the Force Concept Inventory
- 55%: Detecting the influence of item chaining on student responses to the Force Concept Inventory and the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 54%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 54%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
- 54%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
