Materials Similar to Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation with modified module analysis
- 70%: Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis
- 48%: Extending modified module analysis to include correct responses: Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 47%: Replicating analyses of item response curves using data from the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 45%: Applying a resources framework to analysis of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 45%: Rural and First Generation Performance Differences on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 44%: What does the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation pretest measure?
- 43%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
- 43%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
- 43%: Item-level gender fairness in the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
- 41%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 41%: Detecting the influence of item chaining on student responses to the Force Concept Inventory and the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 40%: Applying module analysis to the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
- 39%: The Reliability of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 37%: Force Concept Inventory: More than just conceptual understanding
- 37%: Identifying a preinstruction to postinstruction factor model for the Force Concept Inventory within a multitrait item response theory framework
- 36%: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 35%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
- 35%: Deeper look at question categories, concepts, and context covered: Modified module analysis of quantum mechanics concept assessment
- 35%: Evaluation of high school Cambodian students’ comprehension of the projectile trajectory using the model analysis technique
