Materials Similar to Quantitatively ranking incorrect responses to multiple-choice questions using item response theory
- 61%: Analyzing Multiple-Choice-Multiple-Response Items Using Item Response Theory
- 49%: Identifying a preinstruction to postinstruction factor model for the Force Concept Inventory within a multitrait item response theory framework
- 48%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
- 44%: The Effect of Question Order on Responses to Multiple-choice Questions
- 44%: Linking and comparing short and full-length concept inventories of electricity and magnetism using item response theory
- 41%: Exploring the CLASS with Item Response Theory
- 40%: Assessing the assessment: Mutual information between response choices and factor scores
- 40%: Multidimensional item response theory and the Force Concept Inventory
- 39%: Replicating analyses of item response curves using data from the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 39%: Validity of Force Concept Inventory evaluated by students’ explanations and confirmation using modified item response curve
- 39%: Multidimensional item response theory and the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment
- 38%: Comparing pre/post item response curves to identify changes in misconceptions
- 37%: Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions
- 36%: Multidimensional Item Response Theory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
- 36%: Methods for utilizing Item response theory with Coupled, Multiple-Response assessments
- 35%: Item response theory evaluation of the Light and Spectroscopy Concept Inventory national data set
- 34%: Can multiple-choice questions simulate free-response questions?
- 34%: Criteria for collapsing rating scale responses: A case study of the CLASS
- 34%: Using IBM’s Watson to automatically evaluate student short answer responses
