Materials Similar to Force Concept Inventory: More than just conceptual understanding
- 71%: Analysis to Develop Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Force Concept Inventory
- 66%: Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis
- 65%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
- 65%: Extending modified module analysis to include correct responses: Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 63%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 63%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 62%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
- 61%: Detecting the influence of item chaining on student responses to the Force Concept Inventory and the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 60%: Bias on the Force Concept Inventory across the intersection of gender and race
- 59%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
- 59%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
- 59%: Analyzing the measurement error from false positives in the Force Concept Inventory
- 58%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
- 58%: Balancing content of computerized adaptive testing for the Force Concept Inventory
- 58%: Sensitivity of Learning Gains on the Force Concept Inventory to Students’ Individual Epistemological Changes
- 57%: Confirmatory factor analysis applied to the Force Concept Inventory
- 56%: Validity of Force Concept Inventory evaluated by students’ explanations and confirmation using modified item response curve
- 56%: Assessing the longitudinal measurement invariance of the Force Concept Inventory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
- 55%: Gender & LEAP Pedagogy: What Does The Gender Force Concept Inventory Have To Say?
