Materials Similar to Evidence of measurement invariance across gender for the Force Concept Inventory
- 69%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
- 58%: Gender Differences in Both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance
- 58%: Bias on the Force Concept Inventory across the intersection of gender and race
- 57%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
- 57%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
- 55%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 52%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 52%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
- 51%: Gender & LEAP Pedagogy: What Does The Gender Force Concept Inventory Have To Say?
- 51%: Examining evolving performance on the Force Concept Inventory using factor analysis
- 50%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
- 49%: Racial and ethnic bias in the Force Concept Inventory
- 48%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
- 48%: Validity of Force Concept Inventory evaluated by students’ explanations and confirmation using modified item response curve
- 47%: Force concept inventory
- 46%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
- 46%: Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: What is consistent, what is inconsistent, and what factors influence the gap?
- 45%: Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
- 45%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
