Materials Similar to Maintaining item banks with the Rasch model: An example from wave optics
- 38%: Multilevel Rasch modeling of two-tier multiple choice test: A case study using Lawson’s classroom test of scientific reasoning
- 37%: Model analysis of fine structures of student models: An example with Newton's third law
- 36%: Towards a Model-based Diagnostic Instrument in Electricity and Magnetism: An Example
- 36%: Identifying a preinstruction to postinstruction factor model for the Force Concept Inventory within a multitrait item response theory framework
- 34%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 33%: Designing, validating, and contrasting conceptual quantum mechanics questions for spin states and spatial wave functions
- 32%: Developing coupled, multiple-response assessment items addressing scientific practices
- 32%: Design-based research as a model for systematic curriculum development: The example of a curriculum for introductory optics
- 31%: Analyzing Multiple-Choice-Multiple-Response Items Using Item Response Theory
- 31%: Methods for utilizing Item response theory with Coupled, Multiple-Response assessments
- 30%: Making Waves: A Simulation and Modeling Computer-Tool for Studying Wave Phenomena
- 30%: Applying Rasch theory to evaluate the construct validity of brief electricity and magnetism assessment
- 30%: Generating a growth-oriented partial credit grading model for the Force Concept Inventory
- 30%: Linking and comparing short and full-length concept inventories of electricity and magnetism using item response theory
- 29%: Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism: Analysis of the items and recommendations for improvement
- 29%: Comparing exploratory factor models of the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
- 29%: Creating a coupled multiple response assessment for modeling in lab courses
- 29%: Detecting the influence of item chaining on student responses to the Force Concept Inventory and the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 29%: Designing upper-division thermal physics assessment items informed by faculty perspectives of key content coverage
