Materials Similar to Bias on the Force Concept Inventory across the intersection of gender and race
- 66%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
- 63%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
- 62%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 62%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
- 58%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
- 57%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
- 57%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
- 57%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
- 56%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 55%: Racial and ethnic bias in the Force Concept Inventory
- 53%: Examining evolving performance on the Force Concept Inventory using factor analysis
- 52%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
- 52%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
- 50%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
- 49%: Developing the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory
- 48%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
- 48%: Performance on In-Class vs. Online Administration of Concept Inventories
- 47%: Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
- 46%: Force concept inventory
