Materials Similar to Replicating analyses of item response curves using data from the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 53%: Validity of Force Concept Inventory evaluated by students’ explanations and confirmation using modified item response curve
- 41%: Rural and First Generation Performance Differences on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 39%: Data sharing model for physics education research using the 70 000 response Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for Experimental Physics dataset
- 38%: What does the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation pretest measure?
- 37%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
- 36%: The Reliability of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 36%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
- 36%: Comparing pre/post item response curves to identify changes in misconceptions
- 36%: Multidimensional item response theory and the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment
- 35%: Applying a resources framework to analysis of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 34%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
- 34%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
- 34%: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 34%: Multidimensional Item Response Theory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
- 32%: Validity and reliability of the force and motion conceptual evaluation
- 31%: Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula
- 31%: Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism: Analysis of the items and recommendations for improvement
- 30%: Exploring the CLASS with Item Response Theory
- 29%: Testing the test: Item response curves and test quality
