Materials Similar to Validity of Force Concept Inventory evaluated by students’ explanations and confirmation using modified item response curve
- 44%: Replicating analyses of item response curves using data from the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 38%: Is the Force Concept Inventory Biased? Investigating Differential Item Functioning on a Test of Conceptual Learning in Physics
- 38%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
- 37%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
- 37%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
- 36%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
- 36%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
- 35%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
- 34%: Using the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory to Investigate College students' Pre-instructional Mental Models of Lunar Phases
- 34%: The effect of distracters on student performance on the Force Concept Inventory
- 34%: Examining evolving performance on the Force Concept Inventory using factor analysis
- 33%: Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller
- 33%: Using the Force Concept Inventory to monitor student learning and to plan teaching
- 33%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 33%: Using psychometric tools as a window into students’ quantitative reasoning in introductory physics
- 32%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
- 32%: The Force Concept Inventory: A tool for monitoring student learning
- 32%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
- 32%: Bias on the Force Concept Inventory across the intersection of gender and race
