Materials Similar to Intersectional analysis of Advanced Placement Physics participation and performance by gender and ethnicity
- 41%: Gender inequity in individual participation within physics and science, technology, engineering, and math courses
- 39%: Transfer of Learning through Gender and Ethnicity
- 33%: An Overview on Research on Gender and Under-Represented Ethnicities in Physics Education
- 33%: The Impacts of Instructor and Student Gender on Student Performance in Introductory Modeling Instruction Courses
- 32%: How Perception of Being Recognized or Not Recognized by Instructors as a “Physics Person” Impacts Male and Female Students’ Self-Efficacy and Performance
- 30%: Effect of gender, self-efficacy, and interest on perception of the learning environment and outcomes in calculus-based introductory physics courses
- 30%: Does Instructor Gender Matter for Student Performance in Introductory Physics?
- 29%: Gender Differences in Both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance
- 29%: How a gender gap in belonging contributes to the gender gap in physics participation
- 29%: A validity study of the multiple-choice component of the Advanced Placement Physics C examination
- 29%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
- 29%: COMPUGIRLS’ Standpoint: Culturally Responsive Computing and Its Effect on Girls of Color
- 28%: Developing a magnetism conceptual survey and assessing gender differences in student understanding of magnetism
- 28%: Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: What is consistent, what is inconsistent, and what factors influence the gap?
- 28%: Gender differences in classroom experiences impacting self-efficacy in an AP Physics 1 classroom
- 28%: How Diversity Makes Us Smarter
- 27%: Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions
- 27%: Societal Educational Debts Due to Racism and Sexism in Calculus-based Electricity and Magnetism Courses
- 27%: Facilitating Intersectionally Conscious Collaborations in Physics Education
