Materials Similar to A comparison of student evaluations of instruction vs. students' conceptual learning gains
- 52%: Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies-part I: student learning in physics
- 45%: Student Learning In Upper-Level Thermal Physics: Comparisons And Contrasts With Students In Introductory Courses
- 43%: Detecting the influence of item chaining on student responses to the Force Concept Inventory and the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
- 41%: Assessing Student Learning and Improving Instruction with Transition Matrices
- 41%: A Comparison of Student Misconceptions in Rotational and Rectilinear Motion
- 40%: Variations in students’ epistemological beliefs towards physics learning across majors, genders, and university tiers
- 39%: College physics students' epistemological self-reflection and its relationship to conceptual learning
- 39%: Sensitivity of Learning Gains on the Force Concept Inventory to Students’ Individual Epistemological Changes
- 38%: How physics instruction impacts students’ beliefs about learning physics: A meta-analysis of 24 studies
- 38%: Student resistance to active learning: do instructors (mostly) get it wrong?
- 37%: Impact of traditional or evidence-based active-engagement instruction on introductory female and male students’ attitudes and approaches to physics problem solving
- 36%: Comparing Student Learning with Multiple Research-Based Conceptual Surveys: CSEM and BEMA
- 36%: Students as Co-creators: the Development of Student Learning Networks in PeerWise
- 36%: Exploring Student Learning Profiles in Algebra-based Studio Physics: A Person-Centered Approach
- 36%: Using machine learning to identify the most at-risk students in physics classes
- 36%: Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula
- 35%: Departmental support structures for physics graduate students: Development and psychometric evaluation of a self-report instrument
- 34%: Comparing students' performance on research-based conceptual assessments and traditional classroom assessments
- 34%: Creating a Better Mousetrap: On-line Student Assessment of their Learning Gains
