Materials Similar to When Trying Hard Isn’t Natural: Women’s Belonging With and Motivation for Male-Dominated STEM Fields As a Function of Effort Expenditure Concerns
- 32%: STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
- 28%: Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics
- 24%: How perception of learning environment predicts male and female students’ grades and motivational outcomes in algebra-based introductory physics courses
- 21%: Impact of traditional or evidence-based active-engagement instruction on introductory female and male students’ attitudes and approaches to physics problem solving
- 21%: Effect of culture on women physicists’ career choice: A comparison of Muslim majority countries and the West
- 20%: Understanding Women's Gendered Experiences in Physics and Astronomy Through Microaggressions
- 20%: How Perception of Being Recognized or Not Recognized by Instructors as a “Physics Person” Impacts Male and Female Students’ Self-Efficacy and Performance
- 19%: The Graduate Research Field Choice of Women in Academic Physics and Astronomy: A Pilot Study
- 19%: Negative impacts of an unwelcoming physics environment on undergraduate women
- 19%: How a gender gap in belonging contributes to the gender gap in physics participation
- 19%: Positive attitudinal shifts and a narrowing gender gap: Do expertlike attitudes correlate to higher learning gains for women in the physics classroom?
- 18%: Exposure to Underrepresentation Discussion: The Impacts on Women’s Attitudes and Identities
- 18%: Investigating the role of prior preparation and self-efficacy on female and male students’ introductory physics course achievements
- 18%: Gender differences in the Force Concept Inventory for different educational levels in the United Kingdom
- 18%: Who does physics? Understanding the composition of physicists through the lens of women of color and LGBTQ+ women physicists
- 18%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?
- 18%: Criteria for collapsing rating scale responses: A case study of the CLASS
- 18%: Characterization of Instructor and Student Behaviors in CURE and Non-CURE Learning Environments: Impacts on Student Motivation, Science Identity Development, and Perceptions of the Laboratory Experience
- 18%: Gender Gaps in Achievement and Participation in Multiple Introductory Biology Classrooms
