Materials Similar to Comparing conceptual understanding across institutions with module analysis
- 62%: Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation with modified module analysis
- 62%: Applying module analysis to the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
- 49%: Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis
- 46%: Force Concept Inventory: More than just conceptual understanding
- 45%: Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism: Analysis of the items and recommendations for improvement
- 45%: Comparing exploratory factor models of the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
- 44%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
- 44%: Exploratory factor analysis of a Force Concept Inventory data set
- 43%: Visualizing patterns in CSEM responses to assess student conceptual understanding
- 42%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 42%: Analysis of Student Understanding of Statics Principles
- 42%: Conceptual understanding of Newtonian dynamics in a comparative study of computational modeling and video motion analysis
- 41%: Comparing Student Conceptual Understanding of Thermodynamics in Physics and Engineering
- 41%: Conceptual Understanding of Resistive Electric Circuits Among First-year Engineering Students
- 41%: Comparing pre/post item response curves to identify changes in misconceptions
- 40%: Extending modified module analysis to include correct responses: Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
- 40%: Examining consistency of student errors in vector operations using module analysis
- 40%: The Impact of the History of Physics on Student Attitude and Conceptual Understanding of Physics
- 40%: Multidimensional item response theory and the force and motion conceptual evaluation
