Materials Similar to Digging in: Attending to students’ epistemic emotions while computationally modeling in physics
- 42%: Not engaging with problems in the lab: Students’ navigation of conflicting data and models
- 40%: Assessing the impact of introductory physics for the life sciences on students’ ability to build complex models
- 38%: Measuring Model-Based High School Science Instruction: Development and Application of a Student Survey
- 38%: High school students’ perceptions on the relevance of inquiry-oriented instructional labs as introduction to an extended research project
- 36%: The impact of social integration on student persistence in introductory Modeling Instruction courses
- 36%: Learning enhancing emotions predict student retention: Multilevel emotions of Finnish university physics students in and outside learning situations
- 35%: Designing and implementing materials on quantum computing for secondary school students: The case of teleportation
- 35%: Student views of what counts as doing physics in the lab
- 35%: Student engagement with modeling in multiweek student-designed lab projects
- 34%: Modeling methodology for physics teachers
- 34%: Making Models of Measurement Tools: Examples from Think-Aloud Student Interviews
- 34%: Model-based inquiry vs. Traditional computer simulation-based instruction: Which can better help students construct the quantum-mechanical model of an atom?
- 34%: Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students
- 33%: Qualitative Analysis of Students' Epistemic Framing Surrounding Instructor's Interaction
- 32%: Measuring and Improving Student Mathematical Skills for Modeling
- 32%: Sharp Initial Disagreements Then Consensus in a Student Led Whole-Class Discussion
- 32%: Describing astronomy identity of upper primary and middle school students through structural equation modeling
- 31%: Investigating students’ mental models and knowledge construction of microscopic friction. I. Implications for curriculum design and development
