Materials Similar to From FCI To CSEM To Lawson Test: A Report On Data Collected At A Community College
- 41%: Predicting FCI gain with a nonverbal intelligence test
- 37%: FCI-based Multiple Choice Test for Investigating Students' Representational Coherence
- 36%: Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses
- 35%: Beta-Test Data on an Assessment of Textbook Problem Solving Ability: An Argument for Right/Wrong Grading?
- 33%: Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts
- 33%: Comparing Traditional and Studio Courses through FCI Gains and Losses
- 33%: Comparing Student Learning with Multiple Research-Based Conceptual Surveys: CSEM and BEMA
- 32%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
- 32%: Testing Students’ Understanding of Vector Concepts
- 32%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
- 32%: The Development And Validation Of The Test Of Astronomy STandards (TOAST)
- 32%: Evaluating students’ performance on the FCI at a minority serving institution
- 31%: Examining students' understanding of electrical circuits through multiple-choice testing and interviews
- 31%: Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics
- 31%: FCI normalized gain, scientific reasoning ability, thinking in physics, and gender effects
- 31%: Development of the Astronomy Diagnostic Test
- 31%: Validation and structural analysis of the kinematics concept test
- 30%: Quantum Mechanics Survey (QMS)
- 30%: Determining and Interpreting Resistive Electric Circuit Concepts Test (DIRECT)
