home - login - register

PER Conference 2009 Review Form Statistics

The Editors of the 2009 PERC Proceedings received 79 papers for the peer review section of the 2009 PERC Proceedings. 235 of the 245 solicited peer reviews were received. The acceptance rate for the 2009 PERC Proceedings was 81.0% (64/79).

The following data details the use of each category of the 2009 PERC Proceedings Peer Review form.

  1. Interest/Value to the PER Community

    2 selection of 1 (Weak)
    16 selections of 2
    38 selections of 3
    100 selections of 4
    69 selections of 5 (Strong)

  2. Content Novelty

    5 selections of 1 (Weak)
    17 selections of 2
    51 selections of 3
    100 selections of 4
    53 selections of 5 Strong

  3. Strength of Research

    13 selections of 1 (Weak)
    30 selections of 2
    81 selections of 3
    71 selections of 4
    31 selections of 5 Strong

  4. Conclusions

    14 selections of 1 (Weak)
    29 selections of 2
    85 selections of 3
    74 selections of 4
    24 selections of 5 Strong

  5. Organization of Ideas

    7 selections of 1 (Weak)
    20 selections of 2
    42 selections of 3
    89 selections of 4
    67 selections of 5 Strong

  6. Grammar and Formatting

    5 selections of 1 (Weak)
    23 selections of 2
    30 selections of 3
    76 selections of 4
    91 selections of 5 Strong

  7. In the space below, please write your comments, criticisms, and suggestions regarding this paper. If you need additional space, please include your comments in an attached sheet.

    212 Comments Attached

    38 Supplemental Files Attached

  8. Indicate your recommendation for this paper below. Due to the quick turn-around time required, manuscripts that require substantial or content-based modifications will likely be rejected.

    42 selections of Do not Publish
    130 selections of Publish with Minor Modifications
    55 selections of Publish


Statistics on the use of the 2008 form are also available.