PERC 2016 Review Form Statistics
The Editors of the 2016 PERC Proceedings received 128 papers for the peer review section of the 2016 PERC Proceedings. The acceptance rate for the 2016 PERC Proceedings was 76.6% (98/128).
The following data details the use of each category of the 2016 PERC Proceedings Peer Review form.
-
Interest/Value to the PER Community
8 selection of 1 (Weak)
22 selections of 2
66 selections of 3
160 selections of 4
120 selections of 5 (Strong)
-
Content Novelty
6 selections of 1 (Weak)
36 selections of 2
88 selections of 3
162 selections of 4
83 selections of 5 Strong
-
Strength of Research
22 selections of 1 (Weak)
52 selections of 2
112 selections of 3
142 selections of 4
48 selections of 5 Strong
-
Conclusions
27 selections of 1 (Weak)
66 selections of 2
113 selections of 3
125 selections of 4
42 selections of 5 Strong
-
Organization of Ideas
10 selections of 1 (Weak)
37 selections of 2
75 selections of 3
152 selections of 4
101 selections of 5 Strong
-
Grammar and Formatting
6 selections of 1 (Weak)
31 selections of 2
70 selections of 3
112 selections of 4
155 selections of 5 Strong
-
Comments for the Editor
374 Comments Attached
-
Indicate your recommendation for this paper below. Due to the quick turn-around time required, manuscripts that require substantial or content-based modifications will likely be rejected.
96 selections of Do not Publish
216 selections of Publish with Minor Modifications
59 selections of Publish
-
If you wish to nominate this paper for the 2016 PERC Award, please state your reasons
22 Comments Attached
Comments for the Author: PERC Proceedings
372 Comments Attached
Comments for the Author: Future publications
78 Comments Attached
Statistics on the use of the 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, and 2015 are also available.
