home - login - register

PERC 2016 Review Form Statistics

The Editors of the 2016 PERC Proceedings received 128 papers for the peer review section of the 2016 PERC Proceedings. The acceptance rate for the 2016 PERC Proceedings was 76.6% (98/128).

The following data details the use of each category of the 2016 PERC Proceedings Peer Review form.

  1. Interest/Value to the PER Community

    8 selection of 1 (Weak)
    22 selections of 2
    66 selections of 3
    160 selections of 4
    120 selections of 5 (Strong)

  2. Content Novelty

    6 selections of 1 (Weak)
    36 selections of 2
    88 selections of 3
    162 selections of 4
    83 selections of 5 Strong

  3. Strength of Research

    22 selections of 1 (Weak)
    52 selections of 2
    112 selections of 3
    142 selections of 4
    48 selections of 5 Strong

  4. Conclusions

    27 selections of 1 (Weak)
    66 selections of 2
    113 selections of 3
    125 selections of 4
    42 selections of 5 Strong

  5. Organization of Ideas

    10 selections of 1 (Weak)
    37 selections of 2
    75 selections of 3
    152 selections of 4
    101 selections of 5 Strong

  6. Grammar and Formatting

    6 selections of 1 (Weak)
    31 selections of 2
    70 selections of 3
    112 selections of 4
    155 selections of 5 Strong

  7. Comments for the Editor

    374 Comments Attached

  8. Comments for the Author: PERC Proceedings

    372 Comments Attached

    Comments for the Author: Future publications

    78 Comments Attached

  9. Indicate your recommendation for this paper below. Due to the quick turn-around time required, manuscripts that require substantial or content-based modifications will likely be rejected.

    96 selections of Do not Publish
    216 selections of Publish with Minor Modifications
    59 selections of Publish

  10. If you wish to nominate this paper for the 2016 PERC Award, please state your reasons

    22 Comments Attached


Statistics on the use of the 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, and 2015 are also available.