home - login - register

Conference Proceedings Detail Page

written by Kevin A. Nguyen, Prateek Shekhar, Jennifer Husman, Maura Borrego, Michael J. Prince, Cynthia J. Finelli, Cynthia Waters, Matt DeMonbrun, and Charles R. Henderson
As engineering instructors adopt new teaching strategies, many instructors face anxiety about how their students will respond to their new in-class instructional activities. The fear of student resistance to their new teaching strategy has been identified as a barrier by engineering instructors' adoption and continued use of active learning. This research project focuses on examining students' classroom expectations to explain student resistance to active learning in engineering classrooms. We have developed a survey instrument to study how students respond to in-class instructional practices (StRIP). Descriptive statistics, correlations, and regression models are used to draw conclusions about how students' expectations and perceived occurrence of in-class activities in the course have an effect on how students respond. The population surveyed involved four active learning courses from three different four year public universities (227 total students). Results suggest that there are three significant predictors of student response: expectations of passive instructions two weeks into the course, the perceived occurrence of group work, and the initial expectations of active instruction.

This paper was presented at the Mid Years Engineering Experience (MYEE) Conference, Spring 2016, College Station, Texas.
Mid Years Engineering Experience (MYEE)
Part of the W1A3 series
College Station, Texas: March 30-April 1, 2016
Subjects Levels Resource Types
Education - Applied Research
- Active Learning
- Learning Environment
Education - Basic Research
- Assessment
= Instruments
- Teacher Characteristics
= Affect
Other Sciences
- Engineering
- Lower Undergraduate
- Reference Material
= Proceedings
PER-Central Type Intended Users Ratings
- PER Literature
- Educators
- Administrators
- Researchers
  • Currently 0.0/5

Want to rate this material?
Login here!


Format:
application/pdf
Mirror:
https://www.researchgate.net/prof…
Access Rights:
Free access
Restriction:
© 2016 Nguyen, K., Shekhar, P., Husman, J., Borrego, M., Prince, M., Finelli, C., Waters, C., DeMonbrun, R., Henderson, C.
NSF Numbers:
DUE
1347417
1347482
1347580
1347718
1500309
Keywords:
cooperative learning, educational reform, self-regulation, student engagement, student resistance
Record Creator:
Metadata instance created July 7, 2022 by Lauren Bauman
Record Updated:
August 18, 2022 by Caroline Hall
Last Update
when Cataloged:
January 1, 2016
Save to my folders

Contribute

Similar Materials